@JamesBaker@social.openrightsgroup.org
Post #2402375
2026-03-25 21:51 UTC
@cyberleagle@mastodon.social I did wonder if the ‘duty of care’ would include protection of human rights too or if a ‘serious harm’ could be something that arose from a restriction of a right such a freedom of expression or privacy.
Replies (1)
-
@cyberleagle@mastodon.social 2026-03-25 22:27
@JamesBaker@social.openrightsgroup.org Lord Bridge, Caparo v Dickman: "It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. It always necessary to determine the scope of the duty by reference to the kind of damage from which A must take care to save B harmless." Tort 101.