Post #2392948
2026-03-27 00:53 UTC
@leaverou@front-end.social I'm not clear where the "nothing" option comes from. Is the idea that since the `+ p` isn't a descendent of the div it can't inherit anything from the mix-in? I don't see why that would make sense unless you're going to make all nesting work like that.
For the other two options, I can see use cases for both wanting the argument to the mix-in to resolved at the time the mix-in is applied, or only in the final rule. Maybe support syntaxes for either?
Replies (1)
-
@bramus@front-end.social 2026-03-27 10:47
@AmeliaBR@front-end.social @leaverou@front-end.social That is already possible with the current syntax. See https://github.com/LeaVerou/blog/discussions/137#discussioncomment-16340589 for details :)