Post #2385597

> Not particularly rigorous. Nah, because of the numbers, only 1k people is enough of a sample size for every human. It's exponital increase, not a flat increase... 1,000 isn't even close to the minimum, it's just a nice round number and it's not difficult to reach. It's easily provable by finding any "sample size calculator" and **trying** to get it to tell you to go over that mark. The standard 5% confidence interval is really what's at play. But sample size is day 1 stuff, trying to explain it isn't going to work just play with the calculators and see it's impossible.