Post #2352669

wait omgg this literally means that the most primitive way to define a function could be to give it its own form as a table. that’s fucking incredible actually?? it could even recurse without having any name in any namespace because a reference to itself would be contained in the form holy shit ((primitive-function (print _args.0) ; -> «the function itself» (print _args.1) ; -> 666 (print _args.foo) 668) ; -> 667 666 [:foo 667]) ; -> 668 this is actually genius what the fuck. there is no way that this is actually as good of an idea as I think it is. there must be some reason why this won’t work