Post #2351237
2026-03-20 05:13 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@eliasr@social.librem.one 2026-03-20 05:48
@pid_eins@mastodon.social @cas@social.treehouse.systems I think the way the code change is motivated has some importance here. Normally, in a FOSS project when some change is made it's to make things better for users. The change was requested by users, and doing the change makes users happy. If instead you start motivating code changes with "we change this because of this-and-that law", then that does not feel right to me. Perhaps many users do want the change, but in that case better refer to user demand instead of laws. 1/2
-
@yala@degrowth.social 2026-03-20 15:02
@pid_eins@mastodon.social What is your point, Lennart, if I may ask? I'm right now unable to grasp through the thick layers of irony here. You mention a shitstorm and indirectly hint that cas could have, independent of willingness, become part of it. What is the larger discourse that I am missing, despite PII, age verification and verified computing questions? @cas@social.treehouse.systems
-
@InkomTech@infosec.exchange 2026-03-20 15:32
@pid_eins@mastodon.social Bruh. Reconsider this thread. It’s an outburst of hyperbole. It misrepresents privacy advocacy, and tbh is not clever.