@dvshkn@social.treehouse.systems
Post #2351231
2026-03-20 04:38 UTC
@cas@social.treehouse.systems Have the projects received guidance from actual lawyers? It doesn't seem like the text of the legislation is final in a lot of jurisdictions. I don't know if anybody knows what interpretation or enforcement might look like either. If the devs' hands get forced then it is what it is, but it feels like an own goal to pre-comply too early.
Replies (2)
-
@cas@social.treehouse.systems 2026-03-20 05:50
@dvshkn@social.treehouse.systems i have no idea, but as far as i can tell the work so far is basically just laying the groundwork, nothing specific to the legislation that being said, IANAL obviously but surely there has been prior art in this sense, at the end of the day are distros (that don't explicitly sell/ship their software in california in this case) even responsible for people who live there installing their software even if it doesn't follow local laws?
-
@f4grx@chaos.social 2026-03-20 07:55
@dvshkn@social.treehouse.systems @cas@social.treehouse.systems debian got one I think and it boils down to "just wait"