Post #2351210

2026-03-20 03:26 UTC

@cas@social.treehouse.systems I would ask why providers should make it easier to implement parental controls, given what those are so often used to do (namely, horrifying shit?)

Replies (2)

@jane@smolhaj.social 2026-03-20 03:41

@freya@social.highenergymagic.net your argument sound like an ad hominem. one can also implement parental controls to be not creepy; without it turning into an audit of the child's every activity or doing gps tracking. reasonable parenting is working on limits in cooperation/input of the child. new features i didn't expect and am happly suprised about this release in gnome: https://ubuntuhandbook.org/index.php/2026/01/gnome-50-will-support-bedtime-daily-screen-time-parental-controls/amp/ @cas@social.treehouse.systems

Open ##2351213
@InkomTech@infosec.exchange 2026-03-20 15:04

@freya@social.highenergymagic.net @cas@social.treehouse.systems ****THIS*** “Is it really so bad that oven makers enlarge their ovens to 40 pounds? There ARE other uses beyond cooking children, after all.” Don’t look for Modest Proposals of tech shifts that enable Swift shifts into being abused. ‘Why not add the DOB field’ plus ‘might as well use it’ is a dystopic result from an innocent pair.

Open ##2351225