Post #2346346
2026-05-07 11:29 UTC
@smallcircles@social.coop @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
There was this funny moment where Lemmy and Mastodon developers were in each other’s issue trackers explaining why the other side had implemented something incorrectly, and then the discussion simply faded out.
To be honest, this is also one of the reasons why I am always a bit cautious about sounding offensive in these discussions. I come from the telecom world, and if, for example, a company like Logica publicly said that Mavenir had “the wrong implementation” of SS7, people would probably panic immediately.
Because in telecom, that would effectively mean that depending on the equipment involved, you might not be able to call certain countries — or sometimes even customers of another provider inside your own country.
The reaction would escalate very quickly. I can almost imagine people treating it as outright protocol heresy.
This is why I fear to sound offensive. But this issue is heresy to me.
Replies (1)
-
@smallcircles@social.coop 2026-05-07 11:40
@uriel@x.keinpfusch.net @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz Yes, I can imagine. At the start of my career I worked in a large telecom project to bring phone number portability to the Netherlands, and indeed everything was meticulously specified up to the very last bits and bytes. The biggest problem in AP is not these differences of opinion, but goes to the very heart of the design leaving holes for "misconceptions" to creep in, to use the words of Rich Hickey, which are the most costly to deal with if not addressed. Great, recommended vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f84n5oFoZBc