Post #2346342
2026-05-07 10:34 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@smallcircles@social.coop 2026-05-07 10:44
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz @uriel@x.keinpfusch.net Oh btw, there are a couple of very good IETF documents on protocol design. The term "protocol decay" comes from one of those. See: https://coding.social/blog/grassroots-evolution/#ietf-best-practices
-
@uriel@x.keinpfusch.net 2026-05-07 11:02
@smallcircles@social.coop @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz Honestly, I was mostly thinking about the discussions around Mastodon when it transitioned from 32-bit to 64-bit IDs. That said, your point does make sense to me. If, in the future, people start implementing new extensions โ groups, marketplaces, or other features โ they may gradually end up evolving in somewhat separate ecosystems. I think this is also part of the reason why projects such as Lemmy , federated marketplace experiments, or even Mobilizon can be difficult to integrate cleanly with the wider network: each tends to develop its own assumptions, semantics, and workflows. So I can see the argument for stronger capability discovery mechanisms, whether at the instance level or, in some cases, even at the individual user level.