Post #2327420
2026-05-08 10:52 UTC
@thatv@stranger.social It's too early to say for now, we have a lot of reading to do but we really love Reticulum and it's quality.
We have the feeling that maybe, even if we wouldn't use the full power of Reticulum's cryptographic features (as we would bring our own, "more delay tolerant" and "more broadcast" ones) it should be possible to run this on top of it in any case (even if it's just using the "plain" destination type).
Replies (1)
-
@thatv@stranger.social 2026-05-08 11:10
@p2panda@autonomous.zone this is a good approach I think and I think "more delay tolerance" is always a good idea. As far as I understand Reticulum is more of a better (encrypted/privat) TCP/IP stack with organizes it self via UDP like packes. Read the docu (around 0.8.x iirc) some time ago so maybe things changed. If you want a deylaytolerant store and forward mechanic on top the Reticulum. You could use the #lxmf propagation nodes. But that's just an idea.