Post #2299550

another thought: pointing out that something reads like AI has become a way to feel like you've made an argument without making one. fine, it reads like ai. what did you think of the idea? whether a sentence was written by a human or a machine has no bearing on whether the sentence is true. that's bulverism/genetic fallacy. more useful: "this reads like AI, but I think the argument about X is wrong because…" The but is the part that does the work.