@defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Post #2289872
2026-04-02 13:17 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2026-04-02 14:17
Any system whereby a thousand middlemen don’t get to get a cut of the money is illegal and immoral. /s
-
@nforminvasion@lemmy.world 2026-04-02 13:44
Stallman is proven right more and more everyday
-
@limonfiesta@lemmy.world 2026-04-02 14:18
Russia has banned them, sort of. Although I don't think their methods would work here, or rather, I don't think they could grab the kind of power necessary. Russia now has regional internet blackouts, were they effectively only allow a small number of white listed sites to be accessible. So if you you literally cannot reach the VPN servers because only a handful of Russian government websites, preferred businesses, and UK banks (oligarchs gotta oligarch) are whitelisted, well then you banned VPNs, again, sort of. They did roll out a government approved VPN for specific approved individuals and use cases, to a get around those blackouts....so that's something.
-
@timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 2026-04-02 16:47
This gets repeated a lot - but for avoidance of doubt, practically no normal people use VPNs in China, and the government is very successful at blocking them. You can set up a brand new, never seen before VPN on entirely new IPs and random ports today, and at 1am tomorrow it'll be blocked. Commercial VPNs are basically unusable. (For a while, Cloudflare Warp was a very nice way around - but they put a stop to that too.) IF you have a competent government willing to put the work in, blocking VPNs is entitely doable. That "if" is probably our best hope in the west, though.
-
@phonics@lemmy.world 2026-04-02 14:09
Licences for media are country specific. So vpns allow you to circumvent that. I don't beleive it's piracy. But it's....something.