Post #2279977
2026-04-15 05:51 UTC
@pinskia@hachyderm.io @karolherbst@chaos.social please rephrase this in actual human language.
Replies (2)
-
@pinskia@hachyderm.io 2026-04-15 05:53
@vathpela@infosec.exchange @karolherbst@chaos.social I am pointing out that the signed integer overflow has been taken advantage of since gcc 2.95.3 and so has strict aliasing. My question what semantics of the language has changed that you think should not have since 2000?
-
@vathpela@infosec.exchange 2026-04-15 05:54
@pinskia@hachyderm.io @karolherbst@chaos.social I'm Sorry, I should have expressed that better: I don't understand what you're asking. That doesn't read as a question to me. Please explain your question again.