Post #2252551
2025-12-08 13:06 UTC
@dcnorris@scicomm.xyz I often get related questions after my talks. My standard answer is that unless you have decent computational reproducibility, you don't really know what exactly people have done, so when it comes to exploring replicability, you have to navigate in fog.
Replies (1)
-
@dcnorris@scicomm.xyz 2025-12-09 10:14
@khinsen@scholar.social A well though-out Maslow's Hierarchy style graphic to convey this idea would be useful to me right now, putting [computational] reproducibility as a basic 'physiologic' need. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs I also see this 'feature grid' type of treatment https://co-analysis.github.io/coding-guide/workflow/rap/#code-maturity, which however does not underscore the #reproducibleresearch concept quite as I'd like. Do you use any graphical summaries of this kind in your talks?