@geofflangdale@mastodon.social
Post #2252120
2026-05-06 01:20 UTC
@synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net @regehr@mastodon.social at the time they were delivered. Due to the fact that these instructions are quite unloved, they were not promoted to 256b in AVX2, much less 512b, so they have become even less competitive, but they were *never* competitive against the PSHUFB-table approach for most of the 'we're looking for a known-in-advance table of characters' use cases. Never.
I guess I *did* just write the TIWWW article in your mentions, sorry.
Replies (0)
No replies.