Post #2246195
2026-05-07 05:28 UTC
@jaffathecake@mastodon.social @slightlyoff@toot.cafe https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/iR6R7-nQeHI/m/9Sb7o12jAgAJ lists some more sources for developer feedback, but it looks mostly private, so it's all about whether you trust the team to grade their own homework, which we generally shouldn't. Even if it were public, I don't think I'd have the expertise to tell whether it was net positive, given the selection bias introduced by hosting a hackathon.
Replies (1)
-
@jaffathecake@mastodon.social 2026-05-07 05:56
@jyasskin@hachyderm.io @slightlyoff@toot.cafe the I2S points to https://github.com/webmachinelearning/prompt-api/blob/main/README.md#stakeholder-feedback for evidence which includes "developer surveys", which is a link to a survey that appears to have asked if developers would be happy with this as an "extension API". So yeah, there's something a little fishy going on. "Misrepresentation" is one of the things disallowed in Google's ToU for the Prompt API. I guess, therefore, summarising the I2S with the Prompt API would be breaking the rules.