Post #2231578
2026-03-08 14:25 UTC
@ArtHarg@mastodon.nl
> So you did indeed not read his post but decided to go full porcupine and throw a hissy fit when called out. Talk about arrogance.
Try that gaslighting shit elsewhere.
> Using a free software stack, you could be an effective developer with a relatively low budget. A cheap or used laptop and an internet subscription.
>LLM coding is changing that too. You either need a very powerful and expensive machine to run a local model, or (currently more likely) an LLM subscription. We are lead to believe you have to pay a monthly fee to be an effective developer.
To which I replied
>Excuse me, no. I'm using open source MLs.
Is it this part you don't like? Or this one?
> LLM coding is changing that too. You either need a very powerful and expensive machine to run a local model, or (currently more likely) an LLM subscription. We are lead to believe you have to pay a monthly fee to be an effective developer.
That's a begged question and it's not true either.
> The prospect of your output as a developer being tied to a proprietary service seems risky at best.
Which is, of course, bullshit.
Replies (1)
-
@tuban_muzuru@beige.party 2026-03-08 14:31
@ArtHarg@mastodon.nl So where's your argument, Art? Your website sure is informative.