pointless self censor rule
2026-05-06 14:56 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@otacon239@lemmy.world 2026-05-06 17:14
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Self-censorship is the worst kind because you’re not even initially trying to get the original message out. You’re doing the advertiser’s work for them when you make your posts friendly to the algorithm.
-
@lepinkainen@lemmy.world 2026-05-06 17:25
It’s vector databases all the way down
-
@chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-05-06 23:42
Ok so how do you actually evade algorithmic censorship then? I assume the embedding still is based on transcribed text, so word choice should matter on some level even if it isn’t the be all end all right? The metric of other content preferences of people who prefer your content does seem harder to get around though. Anyway here is the link to the paper the video mentions: concetticontrastivi.org/…/1369118x.2016.1154086.p…
-
@Apytele@sh.itjust.works 2026-05-07 05:38
His name is Adam Aleksic and his book (Algospeak) was REALLY good.
-
@Soupbreaker@lemmy.world 2026-05-07 04:20
It’d be great if people just stopped submitting to these algorithms. Every time I hear someone on a podcast talking about “their” algorithm, as if it were some benign, cutesy thing, I want to puke. Just quit the corporate bullshit and come absorb depressing content on Lemmy like the rest of us, jeez.