Post #2220911
2026-05-07 11:18 UTC
@hugovk@mastodon.social needing 1.5million minutes sounds like a good case for self-hosting, but I imagine GitLab would be happy to charge you for it if you wanted a managed solution. You may also find that the CI is faster, so you may not need so much.
Alternatively, GitLab also allows self-hosted runners against their cloud, so you could do everything with them but save cash hosting your runners.
Not sure about the architectures though. I'm sure it can be done if GitHub is doing it.
Replies (1)
-
@hugovk@mastodon.social 2026-05-07 12:31
@danielquinn@mastodon.social Thing is, we already have another 1.5 million of self-hosted minutes. Some of that CI is very slow and a bottleneck, so by default runs after merge: it's a pain when things then fail (especially on release day!). Unfortunately, I don't think it's feasible to double those queues.