Post #2220909
2026-05-07 08:26 UTC
@hugovk@mastodon.social not off the top of my head I'm afraid.
I use GitLab pretty heavily and *love* their CI system which I feel is far superior (and more approachable) than GitHub Actions.
Codeberg & Forgejo don't have a CI system built-in, but support integration with WoodpeckerCI which is similar to GitLab.
Migrating to either from GitHub is pretty painless though, with automated tools for the job.
Self-hosted GitLab is trickier, but I've worked at a few companies that have managed with limited staff.
Replies (1)
-
@hugovk@mastodon.social 2026-05-07 10:27
@danielquinn@mastodon.social Looks like GitLab CI provides 50,000 minutes per month? https://about.gitlab.com/solutions/open-source/ And Linux (x86-64, arm64), macOS (arm64), Windows (amd64). https://docs.gitlab.com/ci/runners/hosted_runners/ We use 1.5 million minutes per month and also need macOS (Intel) and Windows (arm64 and win32). Woodpecker CI is only linux/amd64 and "provided as-is and might break at any time and for an undefined period of time, due to server issues, for testing and maintenance purposes or human error." https://docs.codeberg.org/ci/