Post #2211612
2026-02-14 16:59 UTC
@AG100pct@infosec.exchange At least based on the reporting, it seems like they were mostly working with natural uranium there? A priori I would think that the biggest hazards would be from the process chemicals and from the heavy metal contamination? I can't find any details, though. Are there any surveys or reports that you've seen on it? I haven't been able to find many descriptions of the process itself or what the wastes were, specifically. I would expect that most of it was nitric acid waste leftover from the initial acid extraction from the ore.
It makes sense though - the banality of the process in the broader context of the time it was being performed makes the scenario ripe for being forgotten by the broader narrative. Uranium refining doesn't have the cache that, say, enrichment or especially reprocessing do, but still produces large quantities (larger, even) of toxic chemical waste.
Replies (1)
-
@AG100pct@infosec.exchange 2026-02-14 17:42
@ckfinite@universeodon.com I'm not a nuclear scientist. Their refinement methods were relatively crude 80 years ago and some of the chemicals in the process were as lethal as Uranium. I copied some of the reports here. One is fairly detailed. The waste is spread throughout the greater St. Louis area in several sites. It's not some minuscule amount. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1BR63i8O-Te5XXGr9048sOimi7FammsO5?usp=sharing