Post #2202857

2024-08-07 15:01 UTC

@larsmb@mastodon.online It's fantastic. Here's the FastGPT version of it. It greatly demonstrates that it doesn't have the ability to count / compute but only combines textual artefacts.

Replies (4)

@theuni@social.tchncs.de 2024-08-07 15:03

@larsmb@mastodon.online And obviously it immediately fucks up any arbitrary counting. And then it gives a reference to some site that obviously doesn't have that "word" in it ...

Open ##2202858
@larsmb@mastodon.online 2024-08-07 15:10

@theuni@social.tchncs.de Oh, I wasn't actually aware that someone else had found this before! Nice. I had actually stumbled across it independently. But it is very funny to me that this is the level of technology that certain people want to ram into everything and are burning 100+ Terawatt hours per year by now. Sure, GPTs, LLMs, ML in general, very cool stuff. But also, as ready as a wet noodle.

Open ##2202872
@echopapa@social.tchncs.de 2024-08-07 15:19

@theuni@social.tchncs.de @larsmb@mastodon.online soifz...

Open ##2202881
@FatherEnoch@mastodon.online 2024-08-11 18:05

@theuni@social.tchncs.de @larsmb@mastodon.online I'm sorry for my ignorance but I thought THE WHOLE POINT of #computers was that they could count. For three to four decades I was told computers were a one trick pony, with the trick being able to count faster than humans ever could. WHY are we making computers that can't count?

Open ##2202884