Post #2198817
2026-03-17 01:18 UTC
@JigenD@mastodon.social @yurisizov@mastodon.gamedev.place this has nothing to do with "complete" or "incomplete". you're assuming the point of art is to just keep iterating towards some weird ideal perfect realism bullshit.
the issue is that this is just replacing actual art with auto-generated slop bullshit, leaving no room for actual artistic intent in the first place.
Replies (1)
-
@JigenD@mastodon.social 2026-03-17 02:18
@joshg@mathstodon.xyz @yurisizov@mastodon.gamedev.place There is objective truth here. Correct lighting is better, anti-aliasing is better, correct shadows are better, and lighting that illuminates polygons correctly is better. No artist intended these incomplete aspects of real time 3d game graphics. These are objectively more complete, and to not have them is incomplete.