Post #2198804
2026-03-17 07:56 UTC
@yurisizov@mastodon.gamedev.place I'm glad I actually read the article because the way you're describing it, it seemed like they'd be foaming at the mouth to try it. This comes off to me as much more neutral than you implied. Sure, I would prefer a recognition that this technology is poisoned like all corporate "AI" is, but not criticizing something isn't the same as shilling for it. This article was mildly positive and curious at worst, and even somewhat apprehensive at times.
Replies (1)
-
@yurisizov@mastodon.gamedev.place 2026-03-17 09:26
@wombatpandaa@mastodon.social They are, in fact, repeating marketing nonsense from Nvidia without challenging it. On every platform they sell this as the future of in-game lighting, they talk about how this doesn’t artificially change anything in game, and that it somehow restores the original creative intent that gamedevs were unable to implement themselves. But thanks for letting me know that this doesn’t pass your threshold for shilling.