Post #2192991
2026-05-07 07:12 UTC
Replies (9)
-
@Akki@toot.lgbt 2026-05-08 07:45
@TrevfromIreland@mastodon.ie Mirrors. We need to carry big mirrors so their faces are in the videos too. Only fair. (Sleepy thought. It's still shit and they deserve a punch to the face and stomped on glasses)
-
@rightsprung@c.im 2026-05-07 08:51
@TrevfromIreland@mastodon.ie Perfect candidate for a doxxing and random filming outside his home....
-
@dropbear@aus.social 2026-05-07 10:33
@TrevfromIreland@mastodon.ie Just another tool for men to abuse us. Everyone knew this would happen, META knew this would happen. No one cares
-
@Pinchy63@ottawa.place 2026-05-07 12:23
@TrevfromIreland@mastodon.ie Here’s an idea. Ban them. What exactly are they for besides stalking people?
-
@proscience@toot.community 2026-05-07 17:43
@TrevfromIreland@mastodon.ie Politicians have to act, and fast.
-
@mahryekuh@hachyderm.io 2026-05-07 17:44
@TrevfromIreland@mastodon.ie What can you do against these things, aside from filing privacy claims once the damage has been done? Like, is there a device one could carry that would only disable the glasses without harming your own tech?
-
@dan_ballard@kolektiva.social 2026-05-07 18:03
@TrevfromIreland@mastodon.ie So I remember many phones long ago being required to have a shutter sound, and a visible red light for recording, but unsure if this was industry opt in trying to get in front of this and then dropping it, or law that was dropped later. But seems like japan still has it https://www.tokyoweekender.com/japan-life/news-and-opinion/why-you-cant-disable-the-shutter-sound-on-japanese-phones/
-
@Bwacton@mastodon.social 2026-05-07 19:58
@TrevfromIreland@mastodon.ie is there some sort of anti filming technology, some glasses or material that renders the cameras ineffective?
-
@WheresMyWater@mastodon.world 2026-05-07 22:37
@TrevfromIreland@mastodon.ie forever dudes doing stupid and criminal stuff