Post #2137180

2026-04-14 09:14 UTC

I found this morsel particularly poignant: > "Ironically, Meta expected rights groups to be too busy to step in, given the disastrous geopolitical climate. > “We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document reads, as quoted by the NYT."

Replies (6)

@thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 2026-04-14 10:53

Who are the morally bankrupt execs who wrote this? I want names.

Open ##2137256
@Gathorall@lemmy.world 2026-04-14 13:33

And I used to think the "secret dastardly plan diary" -files scattered around in Resident Evil and the like were silly B-movie stuff that obviously would not be written down in the real world. But no, they're assigned in company strategy meetings and politicians just hit their sex slave supplier on Gmail with "Heya yo haave sum tasty kiids to fuck in Cali thiss wekend?"

Open ##2137257
@BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2026-04-14 16:53

That's particularly evil. No matter what their lame rationalizations will be, this is how we know that they created this tech in bad faith, and they intend to use it in bad faith.

Open ##2137258
@racoon@lemmy.ml 2026-04-14 14:38

"if such a dynamic political environment fails to come, the corporation will spur on dynamism by sponsoring alternative dynamic groups from within the country whenever possible" Shock Doctrine at its best

Open ##2137259
@Megacomboburrito@lemmy.world 2026-04-15 05:44

Wow, they said the quiet part out loud

Open ##2137261
@NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 2026-04-15 21:08

![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/84483b90-9b28-4321-b80f-584eef6a2ff3.jpeg)

Open ##2137262