Post #2102936
2026-03-03 19:14 UTC
"malpractice" would have been not puling the story/issuing a retraction.
Replies (1)
-
@deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 2026-03-03 21:39
It seems like he had humility, but he put his name on an article that had false content that he didn't verify. That's not a mistake so much as it is neglect of due diligence. Simply checking if the important citations in his article were true would have saved him, but he didn't. I can only imagine how many journalists do this without getting caught.