Post #2102154
2026-05-06 19:11 UTC
the guy’s a bit of an infosec mall ninja, so reread anything he claims in the calmest possible way
Replies (1)
-
@fiat_lux@lemmy.zip 2026-05-06 23:24
I certainly got that impression, and I confess to mostly skimming the parts beyond the technical breakdown for that reason. The conclusions he draws are arguably a bit spurious, but the persistent download and opaque opt-out are interesting facets. Given the controversial nature of AI and the EU’s recent antitrust fines of Google, I can see this getting some legal scrutiny - just not under the legislation he cited. I’d be interested to see how next year’s Google’s DMA compliance report frames it, assuming it’s not lumped into a “confidential” redaction (which shouldn’t even be allowed in a transparency report…).