@Harald_Korneliussen@mastodon.partipirate.org
Post #2095506
2026-04-10 10:22 UTC
Comparing the Wikipedia article on Majavatn with the Grokipedia one was interesting, and probably not in the way you would expect.
Replies (1)
-
@Harald_Korneliussen@mastodon.partipirate.org 2026-04-10 10:30
Grokipedia has lots of stuff on the South Sami presence in the area, written withfairly "progressive" terms even (e.g. colonialism). It's sourced a bit clumsily, but seems reasonably accurate, and the sources are interesting in themselves. Could it be that AI-written wikipedias isn't such a bad idea? It can be very revealing for the model of the world which the language model has built - sometimes even in a positive way.