Post #2084530
2026-04-13 02:31 UTC
@jpellis2008 @BorrisInABox I think it was a concatinated voice, but a very early one. You know that sort of warbly quality you get with some of the older acapella voices? It had way too much of that. It also had less inflection and less brightness than Keynote. So it just came across as more muddled and less punchy. It's just yet another casualty of sighted people assuming voices that sound more like a human are better voices, without doing any actual listening tests with them.
Replies (1)
-
@jpellis2008@dragonscave.space 2026-04-13 02:32
@simon @BorrisInABox Oh yes absolutely.