Post #2082228
2026-05-05 16:30 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@knutson_brain@sfba.social 2026-05-06 06:01
@adredish Science is based on mutual trust…
-
@annakcroft@scholar.social 2026-05-06 06:20
@adredish similarly I object to the rise in reviewing ”credits” going on my record - it’s now one more thing a new academic needs to accumulate for promotion and/or forces the process to be under duress
-
@JonSaenzAgirre@mastodon.eus 2026-05-06 11:42
@adredish I %100 agree with you. This is going to crash. Probably, reviewing will fall first.
-
@koen_hufkens@mastodon.social 2026-05-06 11:47
@adredish I only match my reviews three to four fold for whatever I publish myself. I can't afford these things as an independent lab and consultant. It is one thing to do this on a salary, it is another if you don't know what the rest of the year looks like for the most part.
-
@Robotistry@fediscience.org 2026-05-06 16:51
@adredish Potential solution: UBI for living expenses, grants for research, university/company/professional society for library and community connection? Then the UBI is covering the volunteer work and you get to set how much and what volunteering you want to do, and the grant covers the remaining research expenses (space and equipment and supplies and honoraria for special expertise). You, and your students, and your lab tech all have their living expenses covered.