Post #2028531

If you intentionally target an already disadvantaged population, excluding nuance, adjacent populations and examples, and repeatedly state correctness in the process, you're not making a factual claim or a empirical follow up to a real argument or line of reasoning, then it is evident that you are participating in bigotry. for example: "crime rates in Black and Mexican neighborhoods are higher than many other places..." missing nuance: "...because they are subjected to aggressive zoning tactics, 'poor taxes', decreased humanitarian aid, and institutional racism.." evidence: "...places like Detroit restrict the amount of economic and social force you can exert through strict definitions what what a yard, house, and building can and can't be, and in order to overcome this definition, you have to push through the city's councils and legislators, instead of asking your neighbors." Partially claiming a fact without nuance is a logical and journalistic crime, and should be treated as such. It just so happens that much of corporate social media and journalism thrives off of this content.