@Eatsbluecrayon@rollenspiel.social
Post #1983871
2025-07-16 15:46 UTC
Replies (8)
-
@WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online 2025-07-16 17:58
@Eatsbluecrayon@rollenspiel.social Another demonstration would be to bring a chessboard to class, along with extra pieces, and have the class play chess with an AI of their choosing. They’ll get to watch with their own eyes as the AI fabricates positions and pieces. This is especially useful because computers have been beating human opponents at chess for a long time now, so people know that chess is something computers can do. That an AI can’t indicates it is worse than its predecessors.
-
@altruios@mastodon.social 2025-07-24 17:09
@holdenweb@freeradical.zone @joosteto@mamot.fr @evgandr@mas.to @jadedtwin@corteximplant.com @WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online @Eatsbluecrayon@rollenspiel.social Let’s keep it dumbed down: here’s your proof. 1) Name an emotion. 2) I assign a number: 3) done. Infinite numbers means every emotion is represented a number. It can be done… The real issue is ordering the data sensibly.
-
@altruios@mastodon.social 2025-07-24 17:18
@holdenweb@freeradical.zone @joosteto@mamot.fr @evgandr@mas.to @jadedtwin@corteximplant.com @WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online @Eatsbluecrayon@rollenspiel.social It’s arbitrary: we choose the map. We have only so many chemicals in our brains. The emotional state can be represented by the chemical balances of various neurotransmitters, product with the electrochemical state of the brain. Humans may never be able to represent that level detail: I agree. But, in theory, it could be done.
-
@altruios@mastodon.social 2025-07-24 17:36
@holdenweb@freeradical.zone @joosteto@mamot.fr @evgandr@mas.to @jadedtwin@corteximplant.com @WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online @Eatsbluecrayon@rollenspiel.social you are inserting… something into this conversation… and I don’t know what (bias) that is. Probabilistic outcomes are described by numbers… what makes you think I would think otherwise? It’s numbers all the way down.
-
@altruios@mastodon.social 2025-07-24 17:38
@holdenweb@freeradical.zone @joosteto@mamot.fr @evgandr@mas.to @jadedtwin@corteximplant.com @WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online @Eatsbluecrayon@rollenspiel.social also: I don’t think you are dumb or an asshole. Basic respect for a fellow human: regardless of if we see eye to eye on “numbers vs magic” :)
-
@evgandr@mas.to 2025-07-24 17:10
@holdenweb@freeradical.zone @joosteto@mamot.fr @altruios@mastodon.social @jadedtwin@corteximplant.com @WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online @Eatsbluecrayon@rollenspiel.social Ugh, man, do you confused this social network with Twitter?
-
@evgandr@mas.to 2025-07-24 20:34
@holdenweb@freeradical.zone @joosteto@mamot.fr @altruios@mastodon.social @jadedtwin@corteximplant.com @WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online @Eatsbluecrayon@rollenspiel.social We don't share knowledge or start discussion in #fedi in such aggressive way :dragnsmirk:
-
@pkw@snac.d34d.net 2025-07-24 17:30
"and don’t let anyone tell you it is" Do you have any idea (rhetorical, of course you don't) how stupid that sounds. You "telling" people to not let other people "tell" you stuff. Blow harder maybe. CC: @evgandr@mas.to @altruios@mastodon.social @jadedtwin@corteximplant.com @WhiteCatTamer@mastodon.online @Eatsbluecrayon@rollenspiel.social