Post #1969618

@Belluck@blahaj.zone I feel like most "arguments" on social media go like this. 1. Person makes a blatantly incorrect statement 2. someone decides to intervene 3. the interventionist statemet gets strawmaned to the moon and back, mostly with moralizing statements 4. Flameware ensues, thread goes deeeeep 5.1. Person defending ridicoulis statement realizes that the original intervention didnt ever say what they thought it said 5.2 or one of the 2 ppl ragequit the thread (more likely) I hate ppl using moral in discurse so much its such a week fountadion for any analysis or discussion.