Post #1953625
2026-02-22 14:22 UTC
@lproven @dynamite_ready @reading_recluse
In my opinion, you are incorrect here, and a user is always responsible for digesting the assumed truth as they observe it. Especially on tools. There is no substitute for critical thinking. And there never will be.
Truth and social surrounds are infinitesimally more complex than analyzing a game of chess.
Replies (2)
-
@xs4me2@mastodon.social 2026-02-22 14:23
@lproven @dynamite_ready @reading_recluse LLM do not make up stuff perse, they use data, also wrong data and there is the danger, and in the fact that it cannot referee in what is right and what is wrong.
-
@shadur@mastodon.sandwich.net 2026-03-24 10:05
@xs4me2 @lproven @dynamite_ready @reading_recluse Are you even listening to yourself here? "This is a great tool to analyze and summarize information so you don't have to, but it's still your responsibility to check the analysis and summary to make sure it's correct." It's like the saying -- a stopped clock may give the correct time twice a day, but the only way to check whether it's correct is to consult a functioning clock, which makes it worse than useless.