@dynamite_ready@mastodon.gamedev.place
Post #1953620
2026-02-22 13:29 UTC
@lproven @xs4me2 @reading_recluse
For generating content of any kind, I think there's a reckoning to come. Especially in the 'agentic' space.
But for Information Retrieval, LLMs are great, tbh... I'd argue that also includes those far out stories about prompts leading to new scientific theories, or mathematical proofs.
The tool is a big part of that, but it's the user ('operator'?) that writes the prompts, guides the outcomes, and validates them.
That's a worthy advance.
Replies (2)
-
@Firlefanz@writing.exchange 2026-02-22 13:38
@dynamite_ready The problem is that LLMs just make things up. There are no new discovers, there is no accurate information retrieval. But people don't notice, because they lack the expertise, they lack the ability to check. LLMs cannot be trusted with anything. They are a sheer waste of our world's resources. @lproven @xs4me2 @reading_recluse
-
@xs4me2@mastodon.social 2026-02-22 14:07
@dynamite_ready @lproven @reading_recluse It is the user and their skills indeed. A hammer can be used skillfully or wrong...