Post #1951621
2026-03-22 13:33 UTC
@wwahammy @pavel they clearly *intend* that coverage yes. But this sort of shenanigan has been tried before and has not stood up to challenges, precisely because it’s a free speech issue. It’s likely they made the law as broad as possible knowing full well the courts would limit it.
Replies (1)
-
@pavel@social.kernel.org 2026-03-22 17:50
@calcifer @wwahammy For the record, creating law that goes against constitution .... dunno, is that even legal? Sounds very wrong to me.