Post #1921296
2026-05-03 16:37 UTC
Replies (11)
-
@eliasr@social.librem.one 2026-05-03 16:46
@brainwagon THEREFORE, ANYONE WHO MAY END UP BLAMING THE AI MUST NEVER MAKE A MANAGEMENT DECISION
-
@MaSiKa69@mastodon.social 2026-05-03 17:36
@brainwagon Nope. Whoever blames AI, should be blamed.
-
@clickhere@mastodon.ie 2026-05-03 17:40
@brainwagon This sounds like an unbeatable business plan.
-
@Two9A@hachyderm.io 2026-05-03 17:41
@brainwagon I saw a great example yesterday, but I can't find the source toot: A COMPUTER CAN NEVER FIND OUT THEREFORE A COMPUTER MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO FUCK AROUND
-
@Microplastics101@mstdn.social 2026-05-03 17:42
@brainwagon I think the narrative needs to shift. If you create the program that does bad things, you should be responsible.
-
@toresimonsen@mastodon.social 2026-05-03 19:01
@brainwagon Perhaps it is time for some #accounttability. #among #defcon I am but one.
-
@numodular@c.im 2026-05-03 19:31
@brainwagon B-countable, even if Accountable, precedes you.
-
@lispi314@udongein.xyz 2026-05-03 20:35
@brainwagon Oh no, people are keeping lists and names. The law might not agree, but that's irrelevant.
-
@tomcullen@mastodon.social 2026-05-03 20:36
@brainwagon is this pro or anti AI? 😂
-
@ShnoofleBear@curly.cat 2026-05-03 21:59
@brainwagon Oh, the essence of the ai bs hype
-
@XauriEL@mastodon.nz 2026-05-05 02:59
@brainwagon there's always going to be someone whose job will be to be held accountable for what the AI does (whether they're actually *responsible* for it or not). I don't have the citation ready to hand but someone called this something like a "responsibility sink" in the context of medical techs whose job it was to audit the results of AI diagnosis. If a mistake is made and someone gets injured or killed, the human tech is held to account, not the machine