Post #1916347
2026-04-20 09:17 UTC
@henryseg The dodecahedron-icosahedron variant would be quite a thing. Conversely, I suppose you could also do one which transforms between tetrahedron and, er, tetrahedron. I can’t quite visualise how interesting that might be.
Replies (1)
-
@henryseg@mathstodon.xyz 2026-04-20 14:14
@cassiel Yes! The tetrahedron version would not need the edges to change length, so it would be much simpler.