Post #1912300
2026-01-15 17:20 UTC
@bengo @evan @julian The idea is not just to make class 1 and 2 changes per 6.2.6. The idea is to make class 3 and 4 changes as well. That was in scope of what we discussed during the many meetings about the WG charter.
And I think the fact of the charter getting approved by the CG represents consensus? I wouldn't have agreed to be chair of a group I felt was illegitimate. (I know the consensus does not reflect unanimous consensus. I'm okay with that.)
Replies (1)
-
@bengo@mastodon.social 2026-01-15 17:24
@darius @evan @julian > The idea is to make class 3 and 4 changes as well. It's a bad and unfair idea, is what i"m saying. Totally respect your position if you disagree. > And I think the fact of the charter getting approved by the CG represents consensus? Another half truth. CG consensus is entirely determined by the CG chair. There could be a vast majority against something, and if the CG Chair says there is consensus, there is. 'consensus' is very malleable due to this.