Post #1897307
2026-03-12 11:03 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@svelmoe@hachyderm.io 2026-03-12 13:46
@brembs@mastodon.social I still think it's okay to shame millionaires for flying everywhere just because.
-
@CadeJohnson@toot.cat 2026-03-12 14:14
@brembs@mastodon.social the problem with carbon footprint was "truthiness" - it sounded plausable if you did not think too much about the concept. Assigning emissions to acts of consumption seemed like it could be helpful. But consider the carbon footprint of a lowly carton of ice cream. The emissions from field to factory to refrigerated distribution to grocery, they can all pale beside the emissions if you suddenly decide you deserve a treat, hop in the car, and drive ten miles just to buy that ONE thing.
-
@SuneAuken@mastodon.world 2026-03-12 14:25
@brembs@mastodon.social Interesting thing. I always teach that my students should focus on their handprint: The things they can change rather than fret too much about their individual guilt. One obvious thing to change is how we talk about individual vs systemic responsibility as a precursor to talking about structural change.