Post #1894426
2026-05-01 12:29 UTC
@engideer
It took me by surprise too. That said, I have wrestled with the underlining moral dilemma of living in a capital centric world and it's borderline impossible to not have "blood on your hands" morally speaking either knowingly or unknowingly, one could try to be a monk or something but I believe there is still a moral burden for not being of a greater service to others but at the same time, I don't believe one should just surrender completely to others.
Replies (1)
-
@Mr0@privacysafe.social 2026-05-01 12:38
@engideer My current moral framework is that certain moral comprises are necessary to be a greater moral net positive to earth, and you have to be selfish to do that or any goals you have even though that might be perceived to be cold/Machiavellian to others. "It's better be at peace with oneself and at war with the world than at peace with the world but at war with oneself". (I got that from a clip where Nipsey hussle said something along those lines.)