Post #1888489
2026-04-26 21:31 UTC
@jdw The answer to your first question should be yes since it's already the case that the join of (-∞,0) and [0,∞) in the lattice of sublocales of R is R. Regarding your followup question, it should be fairly easy to define this bump function constructively (on R as a locale and thereby on R as a topological space) since it's computable.
More generally, you can constructively show that for any functions f : (-∞,0] → R and g : [0,∞) → R with the same limit at 0, there is a function h : R → R such that h(x) = f(x) for x ≤ 0 and h(x) = g(x) for x ≥ 0.
Replies (1)
-
@jdw@mathstodon.xyz 2026-04-27 04:11
@jameshanson Thanks! So I guess this means that going from a locale to its topological space of points is not compatible with joins/unions of sublocales? Because otherwise we would get R as a union of the two half rays pointwise? It should be compatible with joins of open sublocales though.