Post #1884986
2026-04-23 04:54 UTC
That’s utter BS. Here are some of the lies I spotted in that document:
IPv8 the new IP protocol that reduces risk, and complexityIPv6 requires you to run two networks forever
Replies (2)
-
@ledoian@pleroma.ledoian.cz 2026-04-23 07:50
@kasperd i stopped reading at the “anonymity” of addresses. whois databases are to my knowledge pretty much public and tacking ASN to the address does literally nothing to avoid malicious actors hiding behind VPNs, other vulnerable machines and/or random residential addresses (hello genAI scrapers in summer) @ghostinthenet @litchralee_v6 @tschaefer @jima
-
@ghostinthenet@hachyderm.io 2026-04-23 11:16
@kasperd @litchralee_v6 @tschaefer @jima This IPv8 pipe dream has no backwards compatibility with #IPv6, so it would •still• require us to run two protocols… or am I missing his NAT86 proposal?