Post #1863620
2026-05-01 22:34 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@0x0ddc0ffee@infosec.exchange 2026-05-01 23:49
@mrencyclopedia So Dawkins failed the Reverse Turing Test? That's hilarious.
-
@Npars01@mstdn.social 2026-05-02 03:13
@mrencyclopedia AI as a honeypot scam. How embarrassing. https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/romance-scam-artificial-intelligence/3847033/ https://theweek.com/personal-finance/romance-scam-common-signs-cost https://www.mcafee.com/blogs/privacy-identity-protection/ai-chatbots-are-becoming-romance-scammers-and-1-in-3-people-admit-they-could-fall-for-one/ Remember folks, nothing communicated to an AI is private. https://www.dw.com/en/how-a-fake-maga-influencer-used-ai-to-power-a-new-scam/video-76998336 They're deliberately designed to be psychologically addictive
-
@PetterOfCats@mastodon.world 2026-05-02 03:21
@mrencyclopedia Richard Dawkins is the only human being that would fail a Turing test.
-
@n_dimension@infosec.exchange 2026-05-02 07:33
@mrencyclopedia My Claude is a rude aussie. I've also switched off its #aiSycophancy so it's always pushing back at my shit. Talked me out of few thing already.