Post #1847381
2026-04-24 12:41 UTC
At that point it's potato, potay-toh. Marx and pretty much every communist philosopher defined it as stateless.
Replies (1)
-
@nullify3112@lemmy.world 2026-04-24 16:17
This makes me very confused because I believe there was nothing stateless about the USSR, even early on following the October revolution. The red army, the new economic policies, the food seizures, forced conscription, the supremacy of the politburo… weren’t they literally banning strikes in factories by claiming all the social issues had been resolved through the soviets, when it wasn’t the case at all (the small bourgeoisie/managers came back and we’re still somewhat in charge)? When I look at it, the power of the Soviet state was omnipresent. But maybe I’m not knowledgeable enough?