Post #1838775

2026-04-30 09:46 UTC

RE: https://bonfire.cafe/pub/objects/01KQETGFGP24Y7VTSHZRDA7KQ1 hey y&#39;all #FediForum ☀️ Who is up for a session on the &#39;+1&#39; concept/strategy and its potential further development? (AFIAK +1 was coined in the &#39;contemporary open social web context&#39; by @rstockm, see https://offene-netzwerke.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Paper_Alliance-Open-Networks-and-Democratic-Public-Sphere_251130.pdf) I&#39;d suggest to go for this AFTER the session that @mayel proposes here, because I feel like this paper presents very useful results to base such a session on. Sounds interesting? Let&#39;s go!

Replies (2)

@cypherhippie@chaos.social 2026-04-30 10:01

@rstockm @mayel here's another link to the paper: https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3772318.3790855 Hints towards 'forkability' and 'polycentricity' let me also cc some of my friends from previous sessions on +1: @samvie @melaniebartos @evan @LaurensHof @vgrass

Open ##2108210
@cypherhippie@chaos.social 2026-04-30 20:17

@rstockm @manfredzielinski @zzepposs @jdlh @reiver @damon thanks for contributing to the session on the "Plus One" (+1) Concept at #fediforum 😎 This link should take you to the notes: https://notes.qiqochat.com/p/cc1-fediforum-2026-04-MNyGF-5-9 -- Lingering question in my head is still: Is there hope that we(*) can agree - at least roughly & temporarily - on when a project seems 'independent enough' from current Big Tech/Capital/Powers? (*) we as in 'those that want to join forces on advocating for a post-platform future'

Open ##2108211