Elektrine lite

โ† Feed

@jakub_et_al@mathstodon.xyz

Post #1816240

2026-02-28 15:56 UTC

@MartinEscardo @dwarn This thread forced me to finally learn some agda, and try to write some proofs. I am attempting to reprove another statement from Taylor's paper. If a topological space admits a majority operation ๐‘š satisfying ๐‘š(๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฆ)=๐‘š(๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฆ,๐‘ฅ)=๐‘š(๐‘ฆ,๐‘ฆ,๐‘ฅ)=๐‘ฅ, then it is weakly-equivalent to a discrete set. Naturally, for homotopy types this would translate to three equations like ๐‘’โ‚ : ฮ (๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฆ : ๐ด) ๐‘š(๐‘ฆ,๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฅ)=๐‘ฅ ๐‘’โ‚‚ : ฮ (๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฆ : ๐ด) ๐‘š(๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฆ,๐‘ฅ)=๐‘ฅ ๐‘’โ‚ƒ : ฮ (๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฆ : ๐ด) ๐‘š(๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฆ)=๐‘ฅ I managed to make ๐‘š act idempotently on the loop space, but encountered an interesting problem: There are a few ways how to prove that ๐‘š is idempotent, and it is not clear which choice to make! I would need something like ฮ (๐‘ฅ:๐ด) ๐‘’โ‚(๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฅ) = ๐‘’โ‚‚(๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฅ). But maybe this is a consequence of what we mean when we write the above majority identities.

Replies (0)

No replies.