Post #1802370
2026-04-24 23:22 UTC
This is a matter of taste, but when someone explains a new concept to me, I prefer them staying in the subject area as much as possible vs. using too many analogies.
For example, to explain molecules and chemical bonding, one book compares the former to a group of children in a playground. One child uses Super Glue—which is an analogy to bonding.
I’d prefer a different approach. But it’s tricky: Very few texts find a good middle ground between too abstract and too concrete.
Replies (1)
-
@fnordius@muenchen.social 2026-04-26 06:33
@rauschma@fosstodon.org it is an art, finding the balance. And one that makes the best in the field of writing such things stand out.