Post #1791881

2026-04-22 13:50 UTC

Is this comment meant for another thread…? I don’t know what the sweet shit you’re referring to. Nowhere here or anywhere have I said anything in support of porn bans. Is this written with like, the assumption that being anti-misogyny is somehow synonymous with being pro-state? Either you’ve got the brainrot from all the bots that feed you your own viewpoints all the time, or this is seriously meant for someone else. Feminists are often anti-porn on the basis of challenging the male gaze and recognition of the inherent coercion within a capitalist system eroding the ability of women to consent… is that what you think you’re referring to? I agree with these feminist views, but they in no way directly correlate with something like the anti-porn ban in the UK, exactly because it is obviously puritanical in nature and therefore patriarchal.

Replies (1)

@mechoman444@lemmy.world 2026-04-22 20:00

You have a very clear and consistent pattern in your responses. I’m not going to dig through your comments again to pull specific examples of where you opposed the porn ban. My point is your hypocrisy, it’s been consistent from your very first comment in this exchange. You repeatedly place blame on men for a wide range of issues, while going out of your way to emphasize that you’re not from the United States. Then you pivot into ongoing gender-based talking points, which come across as an attempt to justify what is, frankly, a weak position. There are more women than men globally, yet you still default to framing men as the problem in nearly every context. Which brings us back to the core issue: people generally don’t like you. More importantly, it seems like you intentionally provoke these kinds of exchanges because you enjoy this type of discourse. Another user called you insufferable. I agree.

Open ##1992946